![]() Virginia that ended all race-based legal restrictions on marriage in the US. In a landmark civil rights decision in June 1967, the Court issued a unanimous decision in the case Loving v. ![]() In his opinion, however, Thomas argues against this interpretation of the clause. ![]() The due process clause prohibits states from depriving Americans of "life, liberty, or property without the due process of law." In the past, the Court has used this clause to protect certain "substantive rights" that are not explicitly listed in the Constitution - such as the right to same-sex marriage - arguing that they are liberties that cannot be infringed upon. He explicitly names the Court's landmark Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell decisions, which protect contraception access, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage. In a solo concurring opinion, Thomas argued the Court should reexamine what rights are protected under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment. When the nation's highest court nullified federal abortion rights that had been secured under Roe, Justice Clarence Thomas expressed that the Court should also "reconsider" rulings that protect contraception access, same-sex-relationships, and same-sex marriage. Wade could put the constitutional right to interracial marriage in jeopardy. Experts fear the Supreme Court's ruling on June 24th to overturn Roe v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |